The standard

Last updated 7 August 2026
Documents and paperwork laid out on a desk
Money, tax and immigration pages are easy to write and hard to trust. Most of what circulates about ITINs, US companies and residency is one blog copying the last one, and the copy that has drifted furthest from the source usually reads the most confidently. This page explains what we do instead, what it costs us in claims we are not allowed to make, and where it still falls short.
The rule

A fact with no published source does not go on the page

Every third-party fact on these guides comes from the organisation that published it. Not a summary of it, not a rewrite: the sentence they printed, stored with the address it came from and the date we read it. As of this writing that store holds 205 such quotes.

The IRS for what an ITIN is and what it is not. A Secretary of State for what a company owes that state. A bank for what that bank says about its own product. The rule underneath all of it is simple. An organisation is an authority on itself and on nothing else, so a bank describing what the industry does is reporting, not committing.

Where nobody publishes an answer, we say so and stop. That leaves visible gaps on these pages. It is the honest shape of the topic, and filling those gaps with a confident guess is exactly how the rest of this niche reads.

Reading how the checking works is one thing. Whether any of it applies to your situation is a different question.

Book Your Assessment Call
The machine

The build refuses to publish a claim we cannot back

The rule is not a promise anyone keeps by remembering. It is enforced by the software that builds these pages, and it runs on every change.

Eighteen automated checks read the finished pages rather than our intentions. One of them compares every quotation on the page against the stored original, character by character. A quotation that has been tidied, shortened without marking the cut, or attributed to the wrong publication stops the build. Nothing ships past it, including when we are the ones who got it wrong, which has happened and was caught this way.

Twenty of those quotations sit on a single page about how the United States taxes non-residents. It went through four rounds of adversarial review before it was published. Every failure found in those four rounds was in our own prose, never in a quote.

The disagreements

When two official sources disagree, we print both and pick neither

Official sources contradict each other more often than anyone expects, and the usual response is to quietly choose the tidier number. We mark those claims contested instead, and a contested claim cannot be cited anywhere on this estate. Fourteen currently carry that mark.

Delaware is the clearest example and it is live on our Wyoming and Delaware comparison. The state statute gives one figure for the annual tax on an LLC. The Division of Corporations gives a different one on its own instructions page. Both were read the same day. Our table prints both, names where each came from, and declines to tell you which is right, because we do not know and neither does anyone else quoting only one.

Paraguay contradicts itself in nine separate places across the material we checked. When the answer arrived from the party who actually runs the service, the pages already published were corrected to match, and the superseded wording is now blocked from reappearing anywhere.

The limits

What this method still cannot do

A standard that only describes its strengths is marketing. These are the edges, stated so you can weigh what you read here.

The checks prove a quotation matches what we stored. They cannot prove the organisation has not rewritten its page since. A quote read months ago and still accurate on our side can be out of date on theirs, which is why the date we read it is printed beside every source rather than hidden.

The full binding is in force on the pages that declare it, thirteen of them today, and the rest of the estate is being brought onto the same footing. Where a page does not yet carry its sources list, that is the reason, and it is a gap we are closing rather than one we would rather you did not notice.

No check catches a page where every quote is accurate and the argument around them still leads somewhere the sources do not support. That failure is ours to avoid and yours to challenge, and it is the reason none of this replaces advice about your own situation.

The method is public. What it means for your case is what the call is for.

Book Your Assessment Call
The use

How to check us, and how to check anyone else

Take the source list at the foot of a page and open one. If the sentence we quoted is not on the page we pointed you at, we have made a mistake and it is worth telling us about.

The same test works on anything else you read about this subject. Find one specific claim, a fee, a deadline, a rule about who qualifies, and try to trace it to whoever is supposed to have published it. Most of what is written about ITINs and US companies does not survive that, and the pages that do are the ones worth your time, whether or not they are ours.

The proof

Client wins from the Hall of Wins

Antonio Leao
Client
"You have the record for the fastest ITIN we have ever processed. We did it in 37 days."
Davide Vignoli
Client
"My ITIN was delivered in 1 month and 2 weeks. Really happy with the process and I am gearing up for my trip to Miami now."
Thor M.
Client
"Got my ITIN within 6 weeks thanks to you and the whole team. I just filled out a form and waited and it came to my mail."
Chris M.
Client
"I got the ITIN as promised, FASTER than I was promised. I got the corporation and everything is done, and whenever I have a question I get my answers right away."
Michael Niziolek
Client
"Got my ITIN in 40-50 days and now I have 2 credit cards already. The experience has been amazing with hands-on support from the team."
Andrew Menechian
Client
"The LLC is fine, the EIN was fine, the ITIN's all good, got the bank accounts remotely, so everything went pretty good."
Neil Ateem
Client
"The process was super quick and easy. Whoever is behind the scenes in your team, they are on it, very communicative."
Povilas
Client
"I have a company in Lithuania doing $5-6m in ad spend through my debit card. I didn't know AMEX existed until I met Miquel and he explained how I was leaving money on the table."
Client confirms the ITIN email arrived and answers the team: exactly 60 days since applicationClient reports a Bank of America credit card approved at a 1,000 dollar starting limit with no prior US banking historyClient's CP565 ITIN letter arrives 38 days after applying; the team notes it is under their 47 day averageClient reports a Bank of America account opened in person, with the credit card appointment booked for the next dayEmail delivering a client's US ITIN with the document attached, and the client's reply: this is excellent newsSpanish-speaking client confirms the ITIN came through and asks for help with credit cards nextClient reports the ITIN took about seven weeks; the team answers to open US banks first, then apply for cardsClient receives the ITIN in 42 days and plans a Miami trip to open US bank accountsClient confirms the US bank accounts are open and thanks the teamInbox message titled Your ITIN is here, with the client's reply: I'm so happy, thank youTwo clients receive their ITINs in 58 days and ask to arrange US bank visits before returning to DubaiEmail from the team delivering a client's US ITIN, with the client's thanks in reply

Real client wins, straight from the Hall of Wins.

Book Your Assessment Call

Read next
Tools
  1. Find your routeTell it what you are trying to do and it maps the guides to read in order.
  2. ITIN document checklistPick your situation, get the exact list the IRS accepts.
  3. What it costsPublished prices and timelines, service by service.
  4. US credit calculatorWhat your spend returns at the rates issuers publish today.

FAQ

Where do the numbers on these guides come from?
From the organisation that published them. Every third-party fact is stored as the sentence that organisation printed, together with the address it came from and the date we read it. That store currently holds 205 quotations. Where nobody publishes an answer, the page says so rather than estimating one.
What happens when two official sources disagree?
The claim is marked contested and cannot be cited anywhere on these guides. Fourteen currently carry that mark. Where the disagreement matters to a decision, the page prints both figures with their sources and picks neither. Delaware's annual tax is the live example: the statute gives one number and the Division of Corporations gives another, both read the same day.
How do you know a quote has not been altered?
The software that builds these pages compares every quotation against the stored original, character by character, and refuses to publish if they differ. A quote that has been tidied, shortened without marking the cut, or credited to the wrong publication stops the build. Eighteen automated checks run on every change, and they read the finished page rather than our intentions.
Does this apply to every page?
The full binding is in force on the pages that declare their sources, thirteen of them today, and the rest of the estate is being brought onto the same footing. A page without a sources list at the foot has not been brought over yet. We would rather say that than imply a standard reaches further than it does.
What can this method not catch?
Three things, and they are worth knowing. It cannot tell whether an organisation has rewritten its page since we read it, which is why the reading date is printed. It cannot catch a page where every quote is accurate and the argument around them still goes further than the sources support. And it is not advice about your own situation, because no page can see the facts that decide an individual case.
What should I do if I find something wrong?
Open the source we pointed you at and check the sentence. If it is not there, or it no longer says what we quoted, that is a mistake worth reporting and we would rather hear it from you than leave it standing. The same test is worth running on anything else you read about this subject.

Bring the questions this page cannot answer

These guides report what is published. The assessment call covers the part no page can reach, which is your own situation, what actually applies to it and in what order. Free, qualified, and direct about what does not apply to you.

Book Your Assessment Call

This guide reports what the authorities and institutions involved publish, quoted, with the date each source was read. It is not tax, legal or immigration advice. Published rules change, and an individual case can turn on facts no page can see.

Miquel Gironès, Founder and CEO of The First Class Citizen
Expert review: Miquel Gironès
Founder & CEO, The First Class Citizen